← BACK_TO_THINKING
Framework10 min read

Domain-First AI: Why Understanding the Problem Matters More Than the Model

Pulse Intelligences|2025-01-08

The AI industry has a model obsession. Every week brings new benchmarks, new architectures, new claims about which model is “best.” But in our experience building intelligence systems across finance, education, supply chain, and technology, we've learned that the model is rarely the differentiator.

What matters is understanding the problem — deeply, thoroughly, and from the perspective of the people who live it every day.

The Model Trap

It's tempting to start with the technology. You have a powerful new model, so you look for problems it can solve. This approach — technology-first, problem-second — is how most AI projects begin. And it's why most AI projects fail to deliver meaningful impact.

The model trap leads to solutions that are technically impressive but practically irrelevant. Systems that can process data at scale but don't understand what the data means. Platforms that automate tasks but miss the decisions that actually matter.

The best intelligence systems aren't built on the best models. They're built on the deepest understanding of the domain they serve.

Domain-First: A Different Framework

Domain-first AI inverts the typical approach. Instead of starting with the model and looking for problems, you start with the domain and design intelligence around its specific needs.

Step 1: Understand the Decision Landscape

Every domain has a set of critical decisions. In financial services, it's risk assessment, capital allocation, and regulatory compliance. In supply chain, it's sourcing decisions, disruption response, and logistics optimization. In education, it's curriculum design, assessment strategy, and resource allocation.

Before touching any technology, we map the decision landscape: What decisions matter most? What information do decision-makers need? Where are the intelligence gaps that slow down or compromise these decisions?

Step 2: Capture Domain Expertise

Every domain has experts — people who've spent years developing intuition, pattern recognition, and contextual understanding. This expertise is the most valuable and least digitized asset in any organization.

Domain-first AI doesn't replace this expertise — it captures and scales it. We work with domain experts to understand how they think, what patterns they recognize, and what context they bring to every decision. This becomes the foundation of the intelligence system.

Step 3: Design Intelligence, Then Select Technology

Only after understanding the decisions and the expertise do we select the technology. Sometimes a large language model is the right choice. Sometimes it's a specialized ML model. Sometimes it's a knowledge graph. Often it's a combination.

The technology serves the intelligence design — not the other way around.

Why This Matters Now

As AI tools become more powerful and more accessible, the gap between generic and domain-specific intelligence is becoming the critical differentiator. Any organization can deploy GPT-4 or Claude. Few can build intelligence that truly understands their vertical.

This is especially true in complex domains like financial regulation, cross-border supply chains, and educational assessment — where the nuance of the domain is as important as the power of the model.

A Practical Example: Supply Chain Intelligence

Consider supply chain disruption monitoring. A model-first approach would deploy a language model to scan news feeds and flag potential disruptions. This works — to a point. It can identify keywords and surface articles about port closures or factory shutdowns.

A domain-first approach starts differently. It begins by understanding how supply chain professionals actually assess disruption risk:

  • What are the leading indicators that experienced professionals watch?
  • How do they assess the cascade effects of a disruption?
  • What contextual factors determine whether a disruption matters for a specific supply chain?
  • How do regional dynamics (China+1, APAC trade patterns) factor into risk assessment?

This domain understanding shapes an intelligence system that doesn't just flag articles — it assesses disruption risk the way an experienced supply chain professional would, but at scale and in real time.

The Bottom Line

The model matters. But the domain understanding matters more. Organizations that invest in deeply understanding their domain — and building intelligence systems that capture that understanding — will build advantages that generic AI can never match.

Domain-first isn't just a methodology. It's a competitive strategy.